A Small Nugget of Wisdom by Darrel Sparkman

darrelsparkman.com

Nuggets of wisdom aren’t always found in famous writings, or by super famous authors.

So let's pose a question.

Is there a difference between your philosophy and your position in life? Does it change with the situation? When the wind is blowing hard one direction, do you pop your sails and go with it or stay the course. It’s the old conundrum—I want to do X but end up doing Y. Not to wax philosophic, but it’s a question that affects author and reader alike.

For the writer it’s the question of staying with the outline of a story or letting the characters go a different way. For some of us that tangent direction is often too compelling to ignore.

It’s different for the reader. Are you being bandied about with no clear path forward? Need to tack sideways? Big questions.

When it looks like you’re going to have to fight like that proverbial third monkey on the ramp to Noah’s ark, which truth will come out? How will your ending be written? Will your philosophy hold true or will circumstances (position) change it?

One of the best sequences of dialogue addressing this comes from Richard Jessup’s novel CHUKA, published in 1961. The hero is surrounded by an enemy that’s overwhelming and mad dog crazy. Is there a chance? Can he save himself, or more importantly, can he save the girl? You might consider CHUKA a romance novel because the hero sees the girl he wants and fights for her with everything he has—like that third monkey.

***

In the book, on the eve of a hopeless battle, a Spanish Duenna was verbally eviscerating the gunfighter about his choices in life. She asked if he had a philosophy. He’s a bit startled. And yes, there will be some paraphrasing.

Chuka tells her there is a difference between his philosophy and his position. Naturally she is skeptical. After all, her job is to protect the young woman in her charge—especially from a common man who hires out his gun.

The gunfighter continues, “A man lives in a country, a place and a time. To live, a man has to be settled on the way he wants to live.”

“Guided by certain principles.” She said.

“Those rules in life, or principles as you call them are simple. Truth comes first. Second comes honor. The third, but by no means less important than the others, is courage.”

Chuka held up his hand to stop her interruption.

“Now my position. My position is to walk with truth, hold on to my honor and find courage to help me over the rough spots.”

She seemed amazed. “Have you found it hard to hold this position?”

“It’s hard to hold it even for a little while. Why? Because we don’t always want to tell the truth, especially when it hurts us or someone we care for.

“And we can’t always hold on to our honor or we’d find ourselves fighting all the time.

“Courage is the hardest of them all. Most times when we find courage it can be too late or too little.

“It takes courage to face truth and courage to recognize your honor is not another man’s honor. One man’s truth, or honor, or courage isn’t a test for anyone else.”

***
   

How often does that happen in life? It’s easy when we’re writing it. We can always go back and edit in the best decision for a certain situation. It's the infamous re-write. You look at the draft copy and say, “Well, that didn’t go as expected.” And then go back and fix it.

But, often in real life we see the right choice going away in the rear-view mirror. Hesitation becomes the dance of the day and the choice we want… slips away.

So, maybe the best lesson is in the less quoted line. “Be settled in the way you wish to live." If you have a position, know exactly what it is and why. If you say you believe in something, can you tell someone why? Otherwise, we’re lost.

Know what you want. Know what you’re willing to do for it. Be settled in it.
​
Let’s write that story line into our lives.



In the story THE LAST WARRANT Luke Randall knows what he wants--a small horse ranch west of Springfield Missouri. It's there waiting for him. All he needs is a reason to give up the Marshal's service and go. Sarah gives him a reason and then takes their position in her own hands.  And yes, toward their goal.

Available October 9, 2018



Have a blessed day.

Darrel






                                                                     

Darrel Sparkman

Website

Amazon Author Page

Facebook Page

Draw! by Darrel Sparkman

Alright you lily-livered polecat—draw!

Were there fast gun artists in the old west?  Sugar Guns?  Quick as the blink of an eye? Hollywood would have us think so.

 I’m visualizing two steely-eyed antagonists facing off in the street, hands hovering over their shootin’ irons and honoring the code of the west—waiting for the other to make the first move.  Both have killed men.  Neither have a drop of sweat on their palms.  Confident.  Deadly.  Waiting.

Then, someone like Val Kilmer totally blows out all your nerve endings and turns your legs to jelly with his little smirk and famous, “Say when.”  Or, Clint Eastwood saying, “Well? You going to pull them pistols, or whistle Dixie?”

Along about this point the bad guy realizes the challenge issued wasn’t a real good idea. It’s not going to end well.

Reading accounts and journals of “Ye Olde West”, the stylized standoff in the middle of the street rarely happened. The better question is why should it?

 

Now, all you old west gun experts don’t start railing on me. There were a plethora of firearms for just about every desired use.  These are the firearm’s I’m choosing to talk about.  Run of the mill, readily available shootin’ irons.

The cap and ball pistols, and later brass cartridges conversions, were heavy and cumbersome.  A case in point is my .44 mag pictured here. 

It’s close in size and weight to older cap and ball pistols and weighs in at three pounds and change.  Until the shorter barreled pistols came on the market, the longer pistols like the Dragoon Colt and Remington were just plain hard to get out of your holster, pants, or coat pocket in any kind of hurry.  If you thought a gun was going to be needed, like as not it was already in your hand. 

Folks carried pistols in a variety of ways, because for most it was a tool, for varmints and such—or an occasional runaway horse.  If you’re dumped from the saddle and your boot is caught in the stirrup, you better hope you can get to your pistol.  Not that I’ve ever read of that happening except in fiction.

But when it comes to arguments between men it’s like the adage says, “don’t strap it on unless you’re willing to use it—don’t use it unless you’re prepared to kill.”  And, that could happen by accident.  Think of trying to shoot the gun out of the hand of your opponent, happens all the time in the movies, right? 

Well, a little harder trigger pull might move the barrel of your gun over a fraction and you’ve just punched his ticket--or missed!  And pistols have something called recoil, especially shooting one-handed. Or, you might start fanning the hammer and hit him, his uncle Jake, three bystanders standing by the saloon, and the team mascot right in the butt.  Is that six?  Of course, you might miss them all.

However, even with the inception of Sam Colt’s finest—all men are not created equal.  I’m sure there were plenty of lawmen and outlaws whose eye-hand coordination was a sight to see, unless it was the last thing you saw. 

But, did it really happen like Marshal Dillon on Gunsmoke?  Rarely.  Some accounts tell of troublemakers showing up saying they’re going to kill some dirty scoundrel, or what they’ll do if he shows up.  Typically called a loudmouth—we’ve all seen them.  Then said scoundrel steps out of an alley with his gun already drawn and shoots the poor misguided soul with no warning.

Unfair?  Depends on your point of view.

I can see it now.  A gunman steps out in the street with his Peacemaker .45 or sheriff’s version—they’re short barreled and you can get them out fast.  The other gunman is standing about fifty yards away with a long barreled Dragoon, or Remington—maybe that Buntline Special.  Much more accurate.  Not going to end well for the short barreled shootist. As a case in point:

GUNFIGHTERS OF THE OLD WEST

by Norman B. Wiltsey

From the 1967 Gun Digest

  

In his celebrated duel with Dave Tutt in Springfield, Mo., in 1865, Wild Bill displayed the cool nerve and accurate marksmanship his legion of admirers claim was always his. The shootout even went off according to fictionalized protocol, to a degree. After an argument each warned the other that the next time they met there’d be powder burned. 

Hickok killed Tutt at an estimated range of 75 yards the next day; Bill on one side of the town square, Dave on the other. Tutt, tensed and nervous, drew first and got off 4 shots – all misses—before Bill, steadying his 1860 Army Colt with both hands, fired one shot that drilled Tutt dead center.

That may have been a Dragoon Colt with a long barrel.

Or, maybe out steps Chuck Connors with his rifle.  Well, that’s not fair!

For more information on Hickock and Tutt you should mosey over to Tom Rizzo’s blog page. http://tomrizzo.com/duel-to-death/  Or, his Facebook page.  Good stuff either place. https://www.facebook.com/thomas.rizzo.writes

From the marshal’s point of view, his job was to keep the peace and rid the town and territory of riff raff... not engage in some kind of contest about who has faster hands.  It’s not a contest, nor a game. 

There were a lot of cranky lawmen and it wasn’t smart to say anything bad about them that might catch their attention.  Many bad guys and law officers alike were shot in the back just for that reason.

But, it goes farther than that.  Anyone going into harm’s way will tell you—if they need someone to watch their back, they don’t care if that person CAN shoot, how many trick shots they can make, or how proficient they are with a firearm.  Give me someone who WILL shoot.

 

I think that was the difference between the normal citizen and the pistoleer.  That line in their mind was already crossed.  While the normal person was thinking should I draw, the gunman was already doing it with no hesitation.  He didn’t need to be fast.

 

This question is explored in my western Hallowed Ground.  Is it murder to kill a man that you know isn’t as fast or good, even if they are trying to kill you?

You hear "he had his chance" bandied about. Did he?

A not so famous frontier character was Frank ‘Pistol Pete’ Eaton who reportedly killed eleven men by the time he was sixteen.  At seventeen he was a U.S. Deputy Marshal working for Judge Parker out of Ft. Smith, Arkansas.  Just to the west of Ft. Smith, the Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railroad (Farther north I think this was the KATY) was the start of no-man’s land, or Indian Territory—later to be Oklahoma.  Posters tacked on trees stated any law officer would be killed on sight.

This outlaw territory was patrolled by Eaton, and the likes of Heck Brunner, Bud Ledbetter, Grant Johnson, Bill Tilghman and sometimes Pat Garrett.  These men served warrants into the territory frequently. 

Quoting from the U. S. Marshals service:  On April 15, 1872, eight deputy marshals were shot and killed in what came to be known as the Going Snake Massacre, which occurred in Tahlequah, Indian Territory.

In 1872 it was reported over a hundred marshals died serving warrants in the territory.  Some reports put it at two hundred.  

Now, I’m betting the marshals that survived working in that country didn’t walk up to the bad guys and challenge them to a shootout on a dusty street.  I’m thinking the outlaw was cut out of the herd, one way or another.  

Logic tells me the lawman would have the ‘drop’ on them and give them a choice to surrender or die.  Many times I’m betting there was no choice given at all, since all they needed to take the outlaw off Judge Parker’s list was provide some identification, in some cases even ears, as proof.

 

A Marine General said, “Anyone engaging the enemy in a fair fight is showing a serious lack of preparation.”  That would be a good rule for ‘way back then’, and today. 

Think of James Garner in Support Your Local Sheriff.  Now there was a man prepared.  I can still see him blowing up Madam Orr’s house. Or was that Support Your Local Gunfighter? Dunno.

Oh, by the way, Pistol Pete died at the ripe old age of 97.  Does ‘ripe old age’ mean old folks start to smell?  I need to do a sniff test.

So, back to the fast draw.  Just Google Cowboy Fast Draw and you’ll find tons of information.  There are several clubs and associations for quick gun artists today.  Everything is about weight, no trigger guards, aluminum alloy barrels, and types of holsters.  Body angle and least amount of movement play a big part.  Methods of firing go from fanning the hammer of the revolver to thumbing and ‘slap cocking’.  Looking over the listed times, the fastest seems to come in at about a third of a second to a quarter of a second.

 

So there you are.  That’s fast.  Real fast.  Sugar guns.  In the blink of an eye.  Especially if the other guy is wondering if the loop is still over his hammer.

Could those fast draws have been duplicated in the old west?  Maybe.

 

Maybe it depends on how scared they were.

Have a great day,

Darrel Sparkman resides in Southwest Missouri with his wife.  Their three children and eleven grandchildren and great grands live nearby.  His hobbies include gardening, golfing, and writing.  In the past, Darrel served four years in the United States Navy, including seven months in Viet Nam as a combat search & rescue helicopter crewman.  He also served nineteen years as a volunteer Emergency Medical Technician, worked as a professional photographer, computer repair tech, and along with his wife Sue, owned and operated a commercial greenhouse and flower shop.  Darrel is currently retired and self-employed.  He finally has that job that wakes you up every day with a smile

Darrel's Website
Amazon Author Page
Facebook

Many thanks to Tom Rizzo for letting me steal part of one of his articles.